ABSTRACT
Background: Spondyloptosis is caused by high force trauma. The vast majority of cases occur in the sagittal plane and at transition points where ridged sections meet more flexible regions. Lateral thoracic spondyloptosis is extremely rare and there is no current consensus on the optimal treatment plan. Case Description: Here we present a case of a previously physically healthy 24-year-old polytrauma patient after he was struck as a pedestrian by a motor vehicle. Of note the patient was found to have lateral spondyloptosis between T9-10 with complete spinal cord transection. The patient also sustained multi-ligamentous left knee injury, pelvic fractures, open comminuted left tibia and fibular fracture, lacerated liver, bilateral renal lacerations, ischemic bowel, and an aortic arch pseudoaneurysm. Conclusion(s): Lateral thoracic spondyloptosis is a devastating injury with an extreme rate of persistent neurologic deficits. There is no unanimously accepted treatment because of the rarity if the injury and the poor outcomes that patients face. Additionally, patients who experience high level trauma often develop severe psychiatric illness, and the importance of identifying risk factors and implementing care early may improve patient outcomes.Copyright © AME Medical Journal.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Background: Primary bone marrow oedema syndrome is an elusive and less well-defined entity. Whether Rheumatologists should consider it as a stand alone diagnosis, is debatable. It possibly would be best described as an MRI feature which could be a finding in a number of diseases which would include the initial phases of Osteonecrosis of the bone, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Spondyloarthritis, Enthesitis related, Post traumatic, OA, Infections and Cancers. The treatment options become constricted due to the paucity of evidence. Rheumatologists need to consider this as an area of unmet need with development of consensus classification criteria and treatment approaches. Description/Method: 27-year-old male, Height 174 cms Weight 90 Kgs BMI 29 Kg/m2, became symptomatic in Jan 2022 with complains of pain in the both hip joints & groin regions, pain became excruciating and he became bed-bound, with early morning stiffness lasting approximately 45 mins. Had received steroids for COVID infection in August 2020. Investigations Hb 13.5gm/dl TLC 7000/mm3 Platelet 400 x 103/mm3 Sr Bil 0.8mg/dl AST 16 IU/L. ALT 24 IU/L Sr Creatininine 1.1mg/dl Blood Sugar Levels, Fasting 89 mg/dl Post Prandial 102 mg/dl ESR 10mm in 1st hour by Wintrobes method CRP Quantitative 29.38mg/L HLA B27 by PCR Negative, RF Negative, ACCP Negative Serum, IgG, Beta2 Glycoprotein 1.44 SGU Serum, IgM, Beta2 Glycoprotein 3.44 SGU Serum, IgG, Cardiolipin antibody 8.4 GPL Serum, IgG, Cardiolipin antibody 17.45 GPL Lupus anticoagulant by DRVVT Negative Sr Cholesterol 211mg/dl HDL 29 mg/dl LDL 156mg/dl TGs 130 mg/dl MRI Hips & SI joints Transient bone marrow oedema/osteopenia of bilateral hip. PET CT Increased metabolic activity in both hip joints Bone Scan (99mTcMDP) Increased vascularity in perfusion phase, increased accumulation in soft tissue in blood pool phase and increased uptake in bilateral Hip joints in skeletal phase scan, suggestive of CRPS Type-I. Management Was initially managed with Tab Etoricoxib 90mg BD, also started on Tab Sulphaslazine and Tab Methotrexate. However, when he had no symptomatic relief he was administered Inj Infliximab on 12 May 2022 and a second dose on 9 June 2022. He had excellent pain relief after the 1st dose, however after 10 days of the administration, he again began experiencing pain especially after walking. He also had pain in the knees on this occasion. He was also administered Inj Zoledronic 4mg on 23 May 2022. He is at present not requiring any NSAIDs over the last 1 month. Discussion/Results: The patient having presented with excruciating and debilitating pain was worked up and evaluation revealed features of bone marrow oedema on MRI which was corroborated with bone scan and PET CT imaging. The acute phase reactant CRP was also significantly elevated. The patient also gave history of early morning stiffness lasting approximately 45 mins. Hence an underlying Inflammatory process such as Spondyloarthritis(Peripheral) with enthesitis was considered. The confounding factors were the pain which worsened on mobilization, HLA B27 negative status, Rheumatoid Factor and ACCP negative status and past history of having received IV Corticosteroids for COVID infection in August 2020. In view of the debilitating pain and aworking diagnosis of Spondyloarthritis, hewas started onNSAIDs alongwith rest, initially, followed by conventional synthetic disease modifying agents in Rheumatic disease followed by biologic synthetic diseasemodifying agent - Inj Infliximab. The thought process was to avoid prolonged NSAID use to prevent the associated side effects. However, since Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral head is a very likely possibility, the patient is planned to be kept under close follow up. Key learning points/Conclusion: Collaborative efforts between the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology are crucial in the early detection and approach to cases of Bone Marrow oedema. Avascular necrosis of head of Femur is a far more common entity and must be kept in ind even when a diagnosis of Bone Marrow oedema syndrome is being entertained. Diagnosis of Bone Marrow oedema syndrome must be entertained only as a diagnosis of exclusion. Continued follow up and regular imaging must be pursued rigorously in patients diagnosed with Bone Marrow oedema syndromes. There is a requirement to document acute phase reactants such as CRP and ESR in patients diagnosed with Avascular necrosis of bone as this data could help us differentiate AVN from Primary Bone marrow oedema in the early stages.
ABSTRACT
Background: According to the recent medical literature, COVID-19 disease can lead to a constellation of clinical syndromes lasting well beyond the frst 30 days of infection. The most common post COVID sequalae includes pulmonary, nervous system and neurocognitive, mental, metabolic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and several other clinical manifestations. Regarding joint involvement and particularly reactive arthritis (ReA), literature data is limited and describes case reports or series of cases of patients diagnosed with this condition following COVID-19 disease. Objectives: To describe the pattern and the management of post-COVID reactive arthritis. Methods: We have conducted a descriptive study of consecutive adult patients who presented to rheumatology outpatient clinic for joint or peri-articular pain/swelling/stiffness and received a diagnosis of post-COVID 19 reactive arthritis, by excluding other types of rheumatological conditions. The assessed clinical variables were: visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), duration of morning stiffness, presence of enthesitis/tendinitis and axial involvement. Biochemistry and serology was performed: rheumatoid factor, ACPA, ANA, HLA B27, antiChlamydia Trachomatis, Ureaplasma Urealyticum and Mycoplasma Hominis Ab, anti HBs and HBc Ab, and anti HCV. COVID-19 disease prior to diagnosis of ReA was confrmed by PCR test. Results: In the study were included 16 patients with confrmed post COVID-19 ReA. The mean age of the study group was 43.5±10.8 (range 21-60), the female: male ratio was 4:1 and the duration of joint symptoms was 10.4±11.8 (range 1-42) weeks. The severity of COVID-19 disease was mild in 68.7% cases, moderate in 18.7% and severe in only 6.2% of the cases. The duration between COVID-19 diagnosis and ReA varied between cases, with a mean value of 4.3±4.2 (range 1-12) weeks. In 43.7% of the cases patients had peripheral joint involvement (synovitis), in 37.5%-periarticular involvement (enthesitis), 6.25%-isolate axial involvement (sacroiliac joints), 6.25% enthesitis and axial involvement (cervical spine) and 6.25% synovitis and enthesitis. In patients with peripheral joint pattern, the distribution of pain was symmetric (71.4%). The pattern of synovitis was determined by a TJC of 6.25±5.2 (range 1-16) joints and SJC 1.6±2.4 (range 0-7) joints. Both TJC and SJC correlated positively with the duration of morning stiffness (r=0.9 and r=0.6), but did not correlate with the VAS pain scale. In most of the cases synovitis affected the hand (wrist, MCP and PIP) 62.5% and the knee, feet and ankles-50%. Two patients presented with monoarthritis, 1 with oligoarthritis and 5 with polyarthritis, in the majority of cases, involvement being symmetric (75%). Periarticular pattern was determined by enthesi-tis, affecting the elbow and shoulder (50%), costo-sternal enthesitis (25%) and trochanteritis (25%). From the entire study group, 31.2% had elevated serum infammatory markers (ESR and/or CRP). Patients responded well to NSAIDs alone in 68.7% cases, local (intra-articular or peri-articular infltrations) or and systemic corticoids (5 mg Prednisolone equivalent) were administered in 5.3% and 12.5% cases respectively, in 12.5% cases (two patients) Methotrexate was administered. Conclusion: Reactive arthritis represents a post COVID-19 sequelae. The time of onset of ReA varied between 1 and 12 weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. The clinical pattern of the disease was expressed by joint or periarticular involvement, mainly affecting the hand, feet and knee symmetrically. Cases of axial manifestations were less common. Most of the patients responded well to NSAIDs, only in a few particular cases, low doses of corticoids and/or Methotrexate were recommended.
ABSTRACT
Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an important cause of infam-matory back pain (IBP). It is under-recognized, leading to signifcant delays in diagnosis. Early recognition and diagnosis are crucial to achieve the best outcomes for patients and in Malaysia, signifcant gaps in the clinical management of axSpA remain. Therefore, we sought to implement a strategy to improve the time to diagnosis and management of axSpA in Malaysia by collaborating and adopting guidance from an international axSpA expert. Objectives: The objectives were to improve disease recognition among healthcare practitioners (HCPs), reducing time to specialist referral and diagnosis whilst improving disease management by developing and implementing a new patient care model called the Spondyloarthritis Accelerated Management (SAM) and measure its effectiveness in 3 Rheumatology centers in Malaysia. Methods: The SAM initiative was developed by the Malaysian SpA Consortium Working Group involving 8 Malaysian rheumatologists from 3 local centers and 1 international axSpA expert from the UK as part of the steering committee. Selections were based on clinical expertise. The frst local alignment meeting on model structure was held in July 2020 with subsequent meetings held to address key barriers to early axSpA diagnosis and timely access to quality care. A care model with feasible key performance indicators (KPIs) was established, adapted and tracked monthly in the 3 rheumatology centers (Figure 1). Referral tools were developed to facilitate early referrals to rheumatologists. These included a QR-coded '3-R' referral guide1 and a patient self-screening tool with a patient self-referral letter all hosted on the Malaysian Society of Rheumatology (MSR) website, educational talks to HCPs and public awareness forums on IBP and axSpA. Data were collected on referral source, duration of referrals, knowledge on IBP in HCPs by surveys and imaging accessibility at baseline and at 1 year after the initiative was launched. Baseline data collected were from August to October 2020 and 1 year data were from November 2020 to November 2021. Results: At 1 year, the SAM initiative showed a 44.4% (Median: 1.33 [IQR 1-1.7] vs 1.92 [IQR 1.6-2.1]) increase in IBP referrals, a reducing trend from 9.5 (IQR 8-11.1) to 5.9 (IQR 5.1-6.8) weeks of waiting time to a frst Rheumatology visit and an increase of 37.2% (34% vs 71%) in IBP patients who were seen at the rheumatology clinic within 6 weeks. All patients with IBP had X-rays (sacroiliac joints or pelvis). MRI requests in X-ray negative patients suspected of axSpA was increased by 13.9% (77.8% vs 91.7%) and waiting time for MRI was reduced by 3.1 weeks (12 vs 8.9 weeks). The IBP knowledge among 224 HCPs improved by 40.6% (45.7% vs 86.3%). The number of patients newly diagnosed with axSpA increased by 40% (Median: 5 [IQR 4-9.5] vs 7 [IQR 6.5-7]) despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The SAM initiative has shown promising initial results in improving referrals of patients with IBP, promoting earlier diagnosis and establishing the importance of having timely access to optimal care. A nationwide implementation is being planned to improve the recognition of the axSpA in Malaysia.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Among the multiple causes of low back and lower extremity pain, sacroiliac joint pain has shown to be prevalent in 10% to 25% of patients with persistent axial low back pain without disc herniation, discogenic pain, or radiculitis. Over the years, multiple Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes have evolved with the inclusion of intraarticular injections, nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy, in addition to percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusions. Previous assessments of utilization patterns of sacroiliac joint interventions only included sacroiliac joint intraarticular injections, since the data was not available prior to the introduction of new codes. A recent assessment revealed an increase of 11.3%, and an annual increase of 1.2% per 100,000 Medicare population from 2009 to 2018, showing a decline in growth patterns. During the past 2 years, the COVID-19 pandemic has also had significant effects on the utilization patterns of sacroiliac joint interventions. STUDY DESIGN: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and analysis of growth patterns of sacroiliac joint interventions (intraarticular injections, nerve blocks, radiofrequency neurotomy, arthrodesis and fusion) was evaluated from 2010 to 2019 and 2010 to 2020, with a comparative analysis from 2019 to 2020 to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To update utilization patterns of sacroiliac joint interventions with assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary (PSPS) Master dataset was utilized in the present analysis. RESULTS: The results of this evaluation demonstrated a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with a 19.2% decrease of utilization of sacroiliac joint intraarticular injections from 2019 to 2020. There was a 23.3% increase in sacroiliac joint arthrodesis and a 5.3% decrease for sacroiliac joint fusions with small numbers from 2019 to 2020. However, data was not available for sacroiliac joint nerve blocks and sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy as these codes were incorporated in 2020. Overall, from 2010 to 2019, sacroiliac joint intraarticular injections showed an annual increase of 0.9% per 100,000 Medicare population. Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis and fusion showed an annual increase from 2010 to 2020 per 100,000 Medicare population of 29% for arthrodesis and 13.3% for fusion. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include a lack of inclusion of Medicare Advantage patients constituting approximately 30% to 40% of the overall Medicare population. As with all claims-based data analyses, this study is retrospective and thus potentially limited by bias. Finally, patients who are non-Medicare are not part of the dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with a significant decrease of intraarticular injections of 19.2% from 2019 to 2020 per 100,000 Medicare population. These decreases of intraarticular injections are accompanied by a 5.3% decrease of fusion, but a 23.3% increase of arthrodesis from 2019 to 2020 per 100,000 Medicare population. Overall, the results showed an annual increase of 0.9% per 100,000 Medicare population for intraarticular injections, a 35.4% annual increase for sacroiliac joint arthrodesis and an increase of 15.5% for sacroiliac joint fusion from 2010 to 2019.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronic Pain , Aged , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Medicare , Pain Management/methods , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Sacroiliac Joint/surgery , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple publications have shown the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on US healthcare and increasing costs over the recent years in managing low back and neck pain as well as other musculoskeletal disorders. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many modalities of treatments, including those related to chronic pain management, including both interventional techniques and opioids. While there have not been assessments of utilization of interventional techniques specific to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, previous analysis published with data from 2000 to 2018 demonstrated a decline in utilization of interventional techniques from 2009 to 2018 of 6.7%, with an annual decline of 0.8% per 100,000 fee-for-service (FFS) in the Medicare population. During that same time, the Medicare population has grown by 3% annually. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this analysis include an evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as an updated assessment of the utilization of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population from 2010 to 2019, 2010 to 2020, and 2019 to 2020 in the FFS Medicare population of the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Utilization patterns and variables of interventional techniques with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in managing chronic pain were assessed from 2000 to 2020 in the FFS Medicare population of the United States. METHODS: The data for the analysis was obtained from the master database from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) physician/supplier procedure summary from 2000 to 2020. RESULTS: The results of the present investigation revealed an 18.7% decrease in utilization of all interventional techniques per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries from 2019 to 2020, with a 19% decrease for epidural and adhesiolysis procedures, a 17.5% decrease for facet joint interventions and sacroiliac joint blocks, and a 25.4% decrease for disc procedures and other types of nerve blocks. The results differed from 2000 to 2010 with an annualized increase of 10.2% per 100,000 Medicare population compared to an annualized decrease of 0.4% from 2010 to 2019, and a 2.5% decrease from 2010 to 2020 for all interventional techniques. For epidural and adhesiolysis procedures decreases were more significant and annualized at 3.1% from 2010 to 2019, increasing the decline to 4.8% from 2010 to 2020. For facet joint interventions and sacroiliac joint blocks, the reversal of growth patterns was observed but maintained at an annualized rate increase of 2.1% from 2010 to 2019, which changed to a decrease of 0.01% from 2010 to 2020. Disc procedures and other types of nerve blocks showed similar patterns as epidurals with an 0.8% annualized reduction from 2010 to 2019, which was further reduced to 3.6% from 2010 to 2020 due to COVID-19. LIMITATIONS: Data for the COVID-19 pandemic impact were available only for 2019 and 2020 and only the FFS Medicare population was utilized; utilization patterns in Medicare Advantage Plans, which constitutes almost 40% of the Medicare enrollment in 2020 were not available. Moreover, this analysis shares the limitations present in all retrospective reviews of claims based datasets. CONCLUSION: The decline driven by the COVID-19 pandemic was 18.7% from 2019 to 2020. Overall decline in utilization in interventional techniques from 2010 to 2020 was 22.0% per 100,000 Medicare population, with an annual diminution of 2.5%, despite an increase in the population rate of 3.3% annualized (38.9% overall) and Medicare enrollees of 33.4% and 2.9% annually.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronic Pain , Aged , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Humans , Medicare , Pain Management/methods , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
Background: Regenerative medicine interventions are applied to assist in the repair, and to potentially replace or restore damaged tissue through the use of autologous/allogenic biologics and it continues to expand. The anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and regenerative properties of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), and investigation into their therapeutic efficacy and safety in patients with severe chronic low back pain, have not been demonstrated in controlled studies. Multiple pain generators have been hypothesized to be responsible in severe spinal degeneration and it is difficult to identify a single pain generator;consequently, resulting in inadequate therapeutic results. Objectives: The study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of autologous bone marrow MSCs in the treatment of chronic low back pain due to severe lumbar spinal degeneration with involvement of multiple structures. Study Design: Prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, parallel-controlled, 2-arm exploratory study. Setting: A private, specialized, interventional pain management and regenerative medicine clinic. Methods: The treatment group patients received a one-time bone marrow concentrate injection into spinal structures (i.e., discs, facets, spinal nerves, and sacroiliac joints), along with conventional treatment, whereas, the control group received conventional treatment with nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs, over-the-counter drugs, structured exercise programs, physical therapy, spinal injections and opioids, etc., as indicated. Outcomes Assessment: Outcomes were assessed utilizing multiple instruments, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11), EuroQOL 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), Global Mental Health (GMH), and Global Physical Health (GPH). Multiple outcomes were assessed with primary outcomes being minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in ODI scores between the groups and/or a 2-point reduction in pain scores. In the study group, total nucleated cells, colony forming units-fibroblast, CD34-positive cell numbers and platelets were also recorded, along with post-procedure magnetic resonance imaging changes. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Significant improvement was achieved in functional status measured by ODI, pain relief measured by NRS-11, and other parameters measured by EQ-5D-3L, GMH, and GPH, in the study group relative to the control group at all time periods. The results showed significant improvements at 12-month follow-up with 67% of the patients in the study group achieving MCID utilizing ODI when compared to 8% in the control group. Greater than 2-point pain reduction was seen in 74% of the patients at 3 months, 66% of the patients at 6 months, and 56% of the patients at 12 months. Both MCID and pain relief of 2 points were significantly different compared to the control group. Opioid use decreased in the investigational group, whereas, there was a slight increase in the control group. Age, gender, opioid use, and body mass index did not affect the outcomes in the stem cell group. Limitations: Single center, nonrandomized study. Conclusions: The first available controlled study utilizing BM-MSCs in severe degenerative spinal disease with interventions into multiple structures simultaneously, including disc, facet joints, nerve roots, and sacroiliac joint based on symptomatology, showed promising results.
ABSTRACT
Case report-IntroductionIn December 2019, the first cluster of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was identified in Wuhan, China. The disease was declared a global pandemic on 11th March 2020. COVID-19 was initially thought to cause respiratory complications only, however several extra pulmonary manifestations of the infection have since emerged.We report a rare case of reactive arthritis (ReA), urticarial rash and angioedema in a young female secondary to COVID-19 infection. Rashes were recently added to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of COVID-19 demonstrating their significance.Case report-Case descriptionA 31-year-old female doctor was admitted with acute swelling of her lips, dysphagia, and a widespread urticarial rash. Preceding this she had a one-week history of fever, cough, and constitutional symptoms of malaise and weight loss. Her symptoms had started at the end of April 2020 during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Three days later she developed painful swelling of her wrists, elbows, knees, and hands. She reported no back or sacroiliac joint pain, enthesitis or any previous history of inflammatory joint pains. She had a history of platelet dysfunction and was treated with Desmopressin.Clinical examination revealed a widespread urticarial rash over her face, limbs, and trunk, with no nail abnormalities. She had active synovitis in her right wrist, elbow, and mild bilateral knee effusions. All other joints including spine and sacroiliac joints were normal. She had no dactylitis or enthesitis. Systemic examination was normal. Investigations revealed Hb 113 g/L, MCV 88.2 fL, Platelets 282 x 109/L, WCC 6.6 x 109/L and Lymphocytes of 0.63 x 109/L with normal neutrophil and eosinophil count. CRP was raised at 107mg/L. She had a negative autoimmune screen including ANA, ANCA, IgM-RF, anti-CCP antibodies and HLA B27. Plain radiographs of knees were normal. SARS CoV-2 PCR was positive following a nasal swab. Urine and blood cultures were negative. Treatment was commenced with intravenous hydrocortisone and antihistamines with resolution of her angioedema symptoms;however, her rash and arthritis persisted.The patient was diagnosed with Reactive Arthritis (ReA), urticarial rash and angioedema secondary to COVID-19 infection. Prednisolone 30mg daily was started, and within a week her arthritis and rash markedly improved. Prednisolone was tapered over six weeks. By her two-month clinic follow up, she reported no further joint swelling and was functioning normally.Case report-DiscussionThe most common complication of COVID-19 is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) however several other serious complications have been identified including cardiac injury, thromboembolic events, neurological abnormalities, and an aggravated inflammatory response causing a cytokine storm.ReA is a post infectious arthritis commonly seen following gastrointestinal or genitourinary infections and is yet to be recognised as a complication of this disease. ReA most commonly presents as an asymmetrical peripheral or axial spondyloarthropathy. The affected joints do not contain pathogen. More than half of ReA cases resolve spontaneously within six months without requiring long-term treatments.Up to 20% of patients with COVID-19 infection have been shown to develop cutaneous manifestations including erythematous rash, vesicular rash, acral ischaemia, rash with petechiae, and widespread urticaria. This has led to the recent addition of rashes to the World Health Organisation (WHO) Criteria for diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Additionally, as COVID-19 has an incubation period of 14 days where patients can be asymptomatic, cutaneous manifestations may serve as an early indicator of infection, aiding in a more rapid diagnosis.Case report-Key learning pointsWe present a rare case of ReA secondary to COVID-19 infection, with complete resolution of symptoms following administration of oral glucocorticoids. A detailed history and examination of t e musculoskeletal system should be undertaken in all patients presenting with COVID-19. Urticarial rashes should be considered as an early symptom of COVID-19 infection as per the WHO criteria for diagnosis. Glucocorticoids can be considered in treating patients with this presentation, where traditional anti-inflammatory agents have been refractory or contraindicated.